LIFE - HOW IT AROSE 1
Currently, Darwinism "was unexpectedly
large difficult" (Francis Hitching, "The neck of the giraffe ",
1982, p.12).
More and more scientists consider
Scientists have no proof that life is not the
result of an act of creation (Robert Jastrow, "The Enchanted By: mind of
the universe", 1981, p.19).
"In the beginning created the heavens
and the Earth", i.e. the solar system bodies (other worlds have already
been). Is the Sun, the Earth, the other planets, the Moon and the satellites of
the planets and other bodies (Gen 1.1). The land was in chaos and darkness, the
lights were not visible with it (v.2).
1st day - "Let there be light"
(v.3). The light of the Sun is visible on Earth and founded the alternation of
night and day, but the sun itself was not visible.
2nd day - "Let there be a
firmament", i.e., space (v.6-8) - Department of water at the bottom of the
water at the top, the clouds.
Day 3 - creation of land (v.9-10). Perhaps
this displaced over of land. The Continents "have roots" (Edwin e. Larson and Peter W.Birkelann,
"Putnam's Geology", 1982, p. 6). The establishment of plants
(v.11). When this light is increased,
and photosynthesis begins. Creating
Day 4 -the emergence of stars, probably as a
result of the scattering of cloud layers (v.14-16). They are visible from
Earth. Light, plants began to actively absorb carbon dioxide and release
oxygen.
Day 5 - creation of the animals in the water
and in the air (v.20-21).
Day 6 -
1. The creation of terrestrial animals (v.24)
2. Creation of man (Gen 2.7)
3. God brings all the animals to humans (
v.19-20)
4. Creation of woman (Gen 2.21-22)
7th day - Saturday - God rested from his work
(Gen 2.1-3).
Creative every day of the week is 12:00 AM,
not millions of years. Read Exodus 20.9-11 and try instead of the word
"day", insert the "thousand years" or "billion
years" that you have, "six billion years work..." etc.
The story of the creation of the world has
nothing to do with the Babylonian myth about the God Marduk, who defeated the
monster Tiamat, and cleaved it in half and one half created the sky, but from
another Earth.
Wallace Pratt said: "If I as a geologist
was asked to explain the modern view of the origin of the Earth temporarily and
the development of life on it paste, perhaps it would be most prudent to
closely follow the text of the first chapter of Genesis" (U.l. Copithorne, The Worlds of Wallace
Pratt,"The Lamp", 1971, p.14).
So, the order of creation:
1. The beginning
2. Land in chaos
3. The light
4. Space or atmosphere
5. The continents
6. Terrestrial plants
7. Lights, visible in space
8. Fish and poultry
9. Animals
10. Man
Could Moses "guess" this order? NO!
The probability of this 1: 3628800 (1:10!)
Teachings about the origin of life are
changing all the time.
The new version of the theory of spontaneous
generation:
The Earth has an atmosphere, composed of
carbon dioxide, methane, ammonia and water. Then these compounds into amino
acids, and proteins, which were a primary broth. "Then randomly a
molecule-method to replicate themselves. It "surrounded" other
molecules, which served as a membrane, i.e. the first cage "made
itself". The author writes: "This book should be read almost as if it
were scientific and is fantastic novel" " (Richard Dawkins, "The
Selfish Gene", 1976, p.9).
In 1953, Stanley Miller criticized the
"atmosphere" of H2, CH4, NH3 and H2O
(steam) Electric level. It appeared only 4 of 20 amino acids.
Protein synthesis occurs only without free
oxygen in the atmosphere. But without it, the first amino acid would be
destroyed by the cosmic rays. It was CREATED (Hitching, "The neck of the
giraffe", 1982, p. 68).
Water prevents the growth of more complex
molecules (ibid.). Therefore, a primary broth "could not be formed".
Formation of proteins depends on DNA, but DNA
cannot be formed without the existing protein (ibid.). The probability of self-appear
of a living cell 1:
1040000.
Despite the fact that the genetic code is
nearly universal, the mechanism required by his incarnation, is too complex to
appear himself at one point (Francis Crick, "Life Itself, Its Origin and
Nature", 1981, p.71). However, if it evolved and developed irregular (not
appeared very suddenly), he was CREATED.
Thanks to photosynthesis in the atmosphere
enough oxygen and an ozone layer. This might not be a simple coincidence.
"Science, after she objected to the
theologian, in that it relies on myths and miracles, found himself in the
unenviable position of MAKING YOUR OWN MYTHOLOGY".
Lauren Ajseli, "The Immense
Journey", 1957, p.200
1. The appearance of cells from non-living
molecules.
"First steps are not known, they are not
left" (The World We Live In, Red Giants and White Dwarts).
2. The emergence of multicellular.
"Not the slightest trace of preliminary
stages" (Science, Red Giants and White Dwarts).
3. About the plants.
"There is no evidence the
ancestors" (The Natural History of Palms).
4. About insects.
"There is no information about the
origin of insects" (Encyclopedia Britanica, "Insects").
5. On vertebrate animals.
"The fossils, however, did not give any
information about the origin of the vertebrates" (Enciclopedia Britanica).
6. About fish.
"Fish appeared suddenly" (Marvels
& Mysteries of Our Animal World).
7. On the development of fish in amphibians.
"We will probably never know how and why
they did it [complex spine, pelvis, legs, muscles and nerves, three-cameras
heart, tongue, the ability to live on land]" (The Fishes).
8. The development of amphibians to reptiles.
"Quite enough shows the evolution of
reptiles in their early when developing an egg covered with shells with complex
structure compared
with caviar" (The Reptriles).
9. On the development of the reptiles to
mammals.
"Link. there is no" (The
Reptiles, The Mammals).
10. On the evolution of reptiles into birds.
"Documented even worse" [feather,
compound eye] (Processes of Organic Evolution, The World Book Encyclopedia).
11. About monkeys.
"Having apparently from nowhere"
(The Primates, Science Digest).
12. From monkey to man.
"The human race is not a pedigree
line" (Science Digest, The New Evolutionary Timetable).
Комментарии
Отправить комментарий